A lot of people ask us which is better to visit – Krka or Plitvice? And it’s a tough question to answer, because they’re both amazing national parks in Croatia! In this article, we’ll compare Krka and Plitvice, and hopefully by the end you’ll be able to decide which one is better for you.
A comparison of Krka and Plitvice
Krka and Plitvice are both national parks located in Croatia. They’re both beautiful places with a lot to offer visitors. Here’s a quick comparison of the two:
- Location: Krka is located in central Croatia, while Plitvice is located in the northwest of the country.
- Size: Krka is much smaller than Plitvice – it covers an area of just 73 square kilometers, while Plitvice covers an area of 300 square kilometers.
- Visitors: Krka gets around 1 million visitors per year, while Plitvice gets around 2 million visitors per year.
Krka National Park is a great place to visit if you’re interested in seeing some of Croatia’s stunning waterfalls. Plitvice National Park, on the other hand, is perfect for those who want to explore Croatia’s lush forests and hiking trails. Both parks are definitely worth a visit if you’re planning a trip to Croatia!
If you’re on a budget, Krka National Park is the better option, as it is cheaper to enter than Plitvice National Park. However, Plitvice National Park is larger and has more to offer in terms of scenery and activities, so it is worth paying the extra if you can afford it.
The pros and cons of Krka and Plitvice
So, what are the pros and cons of each national park? Let’s take a look:
Krka
Krka is a beautiful national park with a lot to offer visitors. The main attractions are the waterfalls, which are some of the most impressive in Croatia. There are also a number of hiking trails, and you can go swimming in the river. The park is also home to a number of historical buildings, including a monastery.
The main downside of Krka is that it can be very crowded, especially in the summer months. This can make it difficult to enjoy the scenery and the attractions.
Plitvice
Plitvice is an absolutely stunning national park, and it’s one of the most popular tourist destinations in Croatia. The park is home to a number of waterfalls and lakes, as well as a large forest. There are also a number of hiking trails.
The main downside of Plitvice is that it can be very crowded, especially in the summer months. This can make it difficult to enjoy the scenery and the attractions. Additionally, Plitvice is located quite far from major cities, so it can be difficult to get to if you don’t have your own transportation.
Another downside of both Krka and Plitvice is that they are both quite expensive. Entrance fees are high, and there are few affordable accommodation options in the area. If you’re on a budget, you may want to consider visiting another national park in Croatia.
Overall, both Krka and Plitvice are beautiful national parks that are definitely worth a visit. However, they both have their downsides. If you’re planning a trip, make sure to take these into consideration.
Which is the better value for money?
So, which national park is better value for money? It really depends on what you’re looking for. If you’re just looking to see some waterfalls and lakes, then Krka is probably the better option. However, if you’re looking for a more complete experience, hiking trails, then Plitvice is the better option.
If you’re looking for a truly unique experience, then Plitvice is the clear choice. There’s simply nowhere else like it in the world. Krka is a beautiful national park, but it doesn’t have the same range of features as Plitvice.
Which is the better destination for families?
Both Krka and Plitvice are great destinations for families.
If you are coming to Croatia with small children, Krka might be a better choice because it offers swimming in a large lake and there are shorter destinations for walking.
Otherwise, Plitvice offers wonderful long paths for walking. If you have children who enjoy walking and exploring nature, Plitvice is definitely your choice.
Which is the better destination for couples?
Both Krka and Plitvice are great destinations for couples. The beauty of nature and water is indescribable in both places, but couples may prefer a walk through nature and longer walking destinations.
Which is the better destination for groups of friends?
Both Krka and Plitvice are great destinations for groups of friends.
In case you came on a hot day and need refreshment and fun in the water, choose Krka. Plitvice can offer you kilometers of walking paths. If you want to have fun and feel like you’ve spent the day actively, choose the Plitvice Lakes.
Which is the better destination for solo travellers?
Both Krka and Plitvice are great destinations for solo travellers.
They will enjoy both places regardless of the crowd, because the advantages of traveling alone are the possibility of enjoying in a group or exploring individually.
Which has the better scenery?
This is a tough question because Krka and Plitvice have stunning scenery. Family, couples, groups of friends or solo travellers will find some special moments in Krka or Plitvice and enjoy them, regardless of the crowds.
Which has the better range of activities?
Again, this is a tough question to answer. Both Krka and Plitvice have a great range of activities on offer. However, we would say that Plitvice has the better range of activities. This is because there are more things to do in the park, hiking is the thing you have to do, when you are there.
Which is better Krka or Plitvice?
So, which national park is better – Krka or Plitvice? The answer really depends on what you’re looking for. If you’re just looking to see some waterfalls and lakes, then Krka is probably the better option. However, if you’re looking for a more complete experience choose Plitvice.